Speaking on Friday 17 September at the national conference of Catholic Head Teachers (CHAPS) at the Hilton Dunblane Hydro Cardinal O Brien defended the provision of Catholic education in Scotland.
Addressing some 160 delegates the Cardinal highlighted the issue of shared
campuses.
He said: The views of local communities are vitally important. Any local
council, in considering a proposal to develop shared campus arrangements for
a specific school, is obliged to consult with the local bishop to seek his
view on the proposal. Many examples of good practice now exist in our
country where the views of the Catholic community have indeed been consulted
and listened to in the construction of shared campus schools.
But I stress that the views of the local community are vitally important “
as the Catholic community was listened to 100 years ago so again we expect
the local authorities to listen to the views of the Catholic community and
we also expect the wishes of the Catholic community to be respected and our
legal safeguards protected and supported by the Scottish Executive.
As our forefathers in the faith in the early 1900s looked forward in
confidence through the safeguards of the 1918 Education Act to a succession
of Catholic schools in our country “ so too do we now look forward at the
beginning of the 2000s at the beginning of a new millennium with confidence
realizing that the safeguards which once existed still exist for
safeguarding discreet Catholic schools where possible and shared campus
arrangements ensuring a Catholic school and a non-denominational school on
one campus where the Catholic partner is indeed a discreet Catholic school
although sharing certain facilities.
The full text of Cardinal O'Brien's homily is shown below.
ENDS
Peter Kearney
Director
Catholic Media Office
5 St. Vincent Place
Glasgow
G1 2DH
0141 221 1168
CHAPS CONFERENCE
(CATHOLIC HEAD TEACHERS ASSOCIATION OF PRIMARY SCHOOLS IN SCOTLAND)
ANNUAL CONFERENCE “ THURSDAY 16TH / FRIDAY 17TH SEPTEMBER 2004
ADDRESS BY CARDINAL KEITH PATRICK O BRIEN
HILTON DUNBLANE HYDRO
Introduction:
It is indeed a privilege being with you all this morning to address your
conference on the final day.
I am sure that you have found your time together beneficial “ appreciating
the input but also having had the opportunity of sharing together with
colleagues old and new.
The general theme of the conference as indicated on the programme is:
Catholic Schools Forward in Faith .
In my address to you this morning when I had been asked to look to the
future “ I would like the address of this particular talk to be quite
simply: Look to the future with confidence!
I give three headings for my address “ perhaps based on my years as a
teacher and wanting to break everything down into easy teaching blocks!
Where are we now?
I would ask you to consider first of all just where we are now in Scotland
at the beginning of this third millennium. We began our meeting yesterday
(Thursday) on the feast of St. Ninian, which takes us back 1600 years ” to
the roots of Christianity in Scotland. It is appropriate that this should be
the starting point for a brief reflection on the journey of faith our nation
has taken since Ninian brought the Christian message to these shores those
1600 years ago. As the centuries passed, the tide of Christianity he led
would flow until it covered the entirety of Scotland in a ˜sea of faith . In
more recent decades that tide has ebbed dramatically and the ˜sea of
Christianity in which we were once immerged has receded. It has often been
replaced by a new tide of rampant secular materialism which has left us on a
sea of self-centred consumerism where we often struggle to chart a course.
It is now more than ever before that we need the moral and spiritual compass
that our faith can provide.
Clearly, things have changed - and changed rapidly since I was a young boy
growing up in Ireland and then in Scotland, Glasgow and Edinburgh. You too,
will be aware of many changes in our society.
We also realise that we are not living in a Catholic society “ but rather
one in which there are a considerable number of members of other Churches.
Many of them share some of our beliefs and are happy for their children to
attend their schools. Just a few months ago I was asked to address the
General Assembly of the Church of Scotland. I was warmly received as always
and was able to speak to the Moderator and the delegates assembled there of
our universal Christian heritage; of our desire to serve together; and also
of the common prayer, which we shared.
There are also those of other faiths. I regularly attend meetings with
leaders of other faiths, such meetings being organized by our Scottish Inter
Faith Council. Men and women from different faiths gather together for some
time of quiet; for sharing our ideas; and for ensuring that our young people
are brought up in a society in which their faiths can be appreciated and
valued and a society in which they can appreciate and share in the faiths of
others. They too often greatly appreciate the fact that high moral standards
are maintained at our schools.
But there are those of no faith at all “ who see your schools as a sign of
contradiction to their own lack of faith and lack of any beliefs.
At one time those who did not practice any particular religion would in some
way or another have been rather ashamed of it. The opposite is true today!
Faithlessness and atheism being a badge of honour for many! It is rather
frightening to hear those who are leaders in society say forcibly: Of
course we are living in a secular society now!
In our schools, primary and secondary, we must be fully aware of the
background from which our people come and aware also of the powerful social
and cultural influences to which they are subject. Catholic Bishops know
what they want - I ask you to be exactly the same and to know what you want
and appreciate everything that is good about our Catholic schools.
The recently produced ˜Charter for Catholic Schools in Scotland has
received a great deal of positive attention from all associated with our
schooling. There it is clearly stated that: The mission of the Catholic
school is to develop as a community of faith and learning, providing the
highest quality of education, and offering formation through the promotion
of Gospel values, through celebration and worship, and through service to
the common good . And the Charter also states: All staff appointed to a
Catholic school are expected to support and promote the aims, mission,
values and ethos of the school, as illustrated in the Charter .
The heritage which is our buildings:
Having spoken of the increasing secular society in which we live I would
like you also to think of our Catholic Christian heritage.
As the increasingly growing Catholic community sought to bring up their
children in the Catholic Faith, they endeavoured to build Catholic schools.
In the early 1900s there were nearly 200 Catholic schools, which had been
built and maintained by Catholic parents for their children. However as a
result of the 1918 Education Act these Catholic schools had been absorbed
into the new State System, taken over by the State in return for certain
safeguards in Law.
Difficulties arose in 1920 when the first of a series of petitions went to
Stirling asking the County to provide a Catholic school for the 200 Catholic
children in the Bonnybridge area. The reply was to become monotonous “ there
is ample accommodation in the State schools in that area. However the
Catholics wished a Catholic school for their children “ and the Scottish
Education Department was asked to compel Stirling to build the school and a
dispute continued which was talked about throughout the length and breadth
of Scotland, in the outer and inner houses of the Court of Session in
Edinburgh and the House of Lords at Westminster. After some years of dispute
a final decision was made that Stirling County Council would have to accept
the transfer of St Joseph s Primary School, Bonnybridge and all the
financial responsibilities involved. That school was built by parents who
intended their children to be educated within the atmosphere of a truly
Catholic school “ built on the rock of faith, faith in God and faith in the
basic fair-mindedness of their fellow men. The result of the famous
Bonnybridge Case was to ensure that the Catholic School system following
on the 1918 Education Act would continue to help in the building of Catholic
schools wherever there was a reasonable cause for asking for them.
We have no reason to fear any possible change in the Laws of our Land.
Perhaps there is more to fear for the Church of today in that there are some
members of our Church and many outside our Church who in public statements
seem to be prepared to water down, even to cast overboard, the legal
provisions and safeguards for which our parents fought. We must remember
that the driving force behind the Bonnybridge Case was the reasonable will
of the parents to have their children educated in the Catholic school. The
source of whatever authority priests and teachers have in the field of
education comes from the trust placed in them by the parents of the children
they serve.
One particular situation arising today particularly where there is a small
Catholic population along with smaller local authorities is the question of
shared campus schools. In a briefing document on shared campus schools of
February 2004 the Scottish Catholic Education Service clearly states: Every
Catholic school community is expected to show its distinctiveness in its
teaching programmes, in its forming of relationships, in its culture and
ethos, in its values, beliefs and assumptions, and in the opportunities it
provides for prayer and worship .
The briefing rightly goes on to state that: It is undoubtedly more
difficult to provide this distinctive form of education in a shared campus
context where two distinctive school communities will live together as
neighbours but not a s one family .
Of course it is for this reason that it is the Church s Policy to support,
in almost all cases, the provision of discreet Catholic schools to meet the
needs of each and every community. The Policy is not intended to suggest a
detachment from social communion and harmony. Rather it is vital if the
Church is to be able to develop the distinctive provision, which has been
highly valued and highly successful.
The views of local communities are vitally important. Any local council, in
considering a proposal to develop shared campus arrangements for a specific
school, is obliged to consult with the local bishop to seek his view on the
proposal. Many examples of good practice now exist in our country where
the views of the Catholic community have indeed been consulted and listened
to in the construction of shared campus schools.
But I stress that the views of the local community are vitally important “
as the Catholic community was listened to 100 years ago so again we expect
the local authorities to listen to the views of the Catholic community and
we also expect the wishes of the Catholic community to be respected and our
legal safeguards protected and supported by the Scottish Executive.
As our forefathers in the faith in the early 1900s looked forward in
confidence through the safeguards of the 1918 Education Act to a succession
of Catholic schools in our country “ so too do we now look forward at the
beginning of the 2000s at the beginning of a new millennium with confidence
realizing that the safeguards which once existed still exist for
safeguarding discreet Catholic schools where possible and shared campus
arrangements ensuring a Catholic school and a non-denominational school on
one campus where the Catholic partner is indeed a discreet Catholic school
although sharing certain facilities.
The heritage which is our children:
Obviously, in speaking to primary school teachers I know and am fully aware
of your important vocation. However, I appreciate that with me you realise
that parents are the first and primary educators of their children informed
by the teaching of the Church.
If the heritage of our buildings is important perhaps we can rightly say
that our heritage of our children is even more important.
Consequently, we realise that in our Catholic schools we must have
academically qualified and highly trained teachers interested not just in
teaching as a subject but vitally interested in the formation of the faith
of the young people entrusted to their care. It is indeed a heavy
responsibility, which lies on the shoulders of teachers in our Catholic
schools “ but I realise that many of you share the motto, which I adopted
when I was appointed Archbishop:
Serve the Lord with gladness . Nothing is more stimulating, nothing is more
challenging, nothing is more fulfilling than forming young people, not only
academically but also morally and spiritually.
It is to assist you in your own particular vocations that I have spoken out
recently about the forthcoming Sexual Education Strategy of the Scottish
Executive.
I am fully aware that a consultation process has already taken place and I
know that many of you will have responded either as individuals, or as
members of your school staff. Many school boards and parents associations
have similarly responded.
I have been asked why I have spoken out so strongly in recent weeks
following on the consultation process. The answer is perfectly clear. I want
all peoples of goodwill to have a further opportunity of entering into
debate and I think that I have stimulated such debate in the past few weeks.
Although over 1,000 responses were received to the consultation, it is
difficult to describe this as ˜wide public debate bearing in mind that a
similar consultation on ˜Smoking in Public Places has to date generated
over 27,000 responses! As one observer put it: There has been more debate
about this sexual education strategy in the 48 hours since Cardinal O Brien
first spoke than in the 48 weeks previously! Consequently, I make no
apology for bringing this debate to the attention of the public in general
and my own Catholic community in particular and would encourage wider debate
and discussion on the topic, before any decisions are made by the Scottish
Executive and a policy is produced and laid before us for implementation.
Secondly, I have become increasingly aware of worries among parents in our
Catholic community and from many people of goodwill about proposals floated
in the consultative document. Safeguards must exist for all our children
from nursery to the top years of secondary school. It is for this reason
that I have asked clarification on a number of issues which are of intense
interest to me and to those involved in our Catholic schools as well as to
others who have written to me. Plans to improve links between schools and
sexual health services mentioned in Para 4.20 of the document cause many
people concern especially in relation to the distribution in confidence of
the Morning After Pill to children.
Proposals in Para 4.17 of the consultation document have caused me to ask
for confirmation that sex and relationships education resources and
approaches which use suggestive role-playing, graphic imagery or intimate
questioning will not be used in pre-school or primary schools and that no
approach will be used in isolation from any guidance on basic moral values.
Knowing that in speaking to you I am also speaking to many parents, I have
also asked for confirmation that the morning after pill will not be made
available in confidence to school children without parental consent, either
within schools or facilitated by health workers in and around schools. It is
relatively easy to state that this pill will not be given out within schools
but in a recent article in a national paper it is stated: Health workers
are routinely arranging for Scottish schoolgirls to receive emergency
contraception despite a vow by the First Minister that the morning after
pill will not be handed out in schools . The newspaper investigation has
apparently uncovered numerous ways in which health professionals bypass
Government Policy to provide children with the morning after pill without
their parents ever being told.
In our Catholic schools we must have a commitment on the part of all those
working in our schools to uphold the moral teaching, faith, tradition and
sacramental life of our Church. To this end, I have asked, that the right
of denominational schools to set protocols governing the work of health
professionals be respected
From the beginning of Christianity emphasis has been placed on a stable
relationship in marriage as being the best way in which children are
educated and formed. Consequently, I have appealed for abstinence-based
approaches to be used with regard to sex education; I have urged fidelity in
marriage; and have asked for any sex and relationships education to be set
at all times in a moral context.
We must be aware that others who do not observe our standards and our moral
values are constantly seeking to erode them and affect not only our children
but the morality of society.
In our Catholic schools we must set the highest standards of education and
formation. I recommend to you the Guidance Notes for Teaching Relationships
and Moral Education produced by the Catholic Education. These guidance
notes should be the basis for all that we are endeavouring to teach in our
Catholic schools in this area. Various excellent courses have been produced
“ the Scottish Catholic Education Service will be assessing these and I
commend their future recommendations to you all.
Conclusion:
I have spoken this morning of the society in which we live; of the Christian
heritage we value, of the precious heritage, which are our Catholic schools;
and of our children an even more important heritage.
Your vocation as teachers and leaders, in Catholic primary schools, is a
precious and vital one. As I have been called to my vocation, so you have
been called to yours.
Together we must strengthen our desire to live our faith as best we can and
to transmit that faith to those we teach.
In the words of one of our familiar hymns, words taken from sacred scripture
we are taught: When God is for us who can be against! God is indeed for us
“ no one can be against “ strong in our faith and in our commitment we do
indeed go forward evermore confidently into the future, a future in which
each one of us has an important role to play as a follower of Jesus Christ.
ENDS
SCMO | 3 days ago | Blogging
Return to Worship in time for Easter 1 March 2021 Responding to last week’s statement on the reopening of Places of Worship by the First Minister, the Catholic Bishops of Scotland have issued a statement welcoming the move and calling for a removal of the cap, which limits the number of people who can attend. Instead, the bishops maintain congregation size should be calculated in accordance with the size of each church, a system similar to that used in the retail sector, which still maintains social distancing regulations. The full text of the statement is shown below. ENDS Peter Kearney Director Catholic Media Office 0141 221 116807968 122291 pk@scmo.org www.scmo.org As Scotland’s Catholic bishops, we welcome the recent announcement by the First Minister foreseeing a return to our churches for the most important celebration of the liturgical year at Easter. We also welcome the recognition of the status of public worship implicit in this decision. The Catholic Community recognises the seriousness of the pandemic and is committed to working with others to avoid the spreading of infection. At the same time, we anticipate ongoing dialogue with the Scottish Government regarding the requirement of a numerical “cap” on the number of worshippers. As we continue to observe social distancing and the protocols on infection control and hygiene formulated by the Bishops’ Conference working group under the leadership of the former Chief Medical Officer Sir Harry Burns, we maintain that it would be more appropriate for each church building to accommodate a congregation in proportion to its size rather than on the basis of an imposed number. We echo here the timely words Pope Francis addressed to the representatives of countries to the Holy See on the 8th February 2021: Even as we seek ways to protect human lives from the spread of the virus, we cannot view the spiritual and moral dimension of the human person as less important than physical health. The opening of churches is a sign that the sacrifices endured so far are bearing fruit and gives us hope and encouragement to persevere. We pray that the Risen Christ, for whom we long during this holy season of Lent, will bless and bring healing to our nation. ...
SCMO | 12th February 2021 | Blogging
Church leaders urge withdraw of controversial section of Hate Crime Bill to allow “adequate consideration” Friday 12 February An unprecedented alliance of Catholic and Evangelical church leaders are urging the Scottish Government to drop part of its proposed Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Bill to allow time for “detailed consideration of crucial provisions.” The Bill, which would potentially criminalise any criticism of Transgender ideology has been criticised by the Catholic Church, the Free Church of Scotland and the Evangelical Alliance. In a letter addressed today (Friday 12 February) to the Cabinet Secretary for Justice Humza Yousaf, the church leaders call for greater protections for freedom of expression and say: “We believe that people should be completely free to disagree with our faith in any way, including mocking and ridiculing us. We are convinced that our faith is true and has a sufficient evidential basis to withstand any criticism, we therefore welcome open debate.” By contrast, concerns are raised that any disagreement with or criticism of Transgender identity could fall foul of the new law, if passed in its current form. The church leaders point out, that “Transgender identity has been subject of extensive and emotional public discussion. Such free discussion and criticism of views is vital as society wrestles with these ideas.” They warn however, that they “cannot accept that any position or opinion at variance with the proposition that sex (or gender) is fluid and changeable should not be heard.” The letter marks the first time Catholic, Free Church and Evangelical Alliance leaders have jointly petitioned the Scottish Government and sought a meeting with the Cabinet Secretary for Justice. Supporting “open and honest debate” the letter ends with an assertion, that “A right to claim that binary sex does not exist or is fluid must be matched with a right to disagree with that opinion; and protection from prosecution for holding it.” As well as a warning that: ”The Parliament now has approximately four weeks to complete the passage of the bill. This is extraordinarily tight and risks inadequate and ill-thought through legislation being passed. No workable solutions to issues of freedom of expression have so far been suggested. If no such solutions can be found we hope the Scottish Government will now consider withdrawing the stirring up hatred offences in Part 2 of the bill to allow more detailed consideration and discussion and to ensure freedom of expression provisions, which enshrine free and open debate, are afforded the scrutiny they require.” ENDS Peter Kearney Director Catholic Media Office 5 St. Vincent Place Glasgow G1 2DH 0141 221 116807968 122291 pk@scmo.org www.scmo.org Notes to Editors: The full text of the letter is shown below. Humza Yousaf MSP Cabinet Secretary for Justice The Scottish Government St. Andrew's House Edinburgh EH1 3DG Friday 12th February 2021 Dear Mr Yousaf, Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Bill – Stage 2 amendments We are writing to you as representatives of three communities of churches in Scotland in relation to the progress of the Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) bill at Stage 2 and to ask if we may be able to meet with you in the coming days in relation to this. As you know we have engaged extensively throughout the bill process including a number of meetings with you and your officials, and all gave oral evidence to the Justice Committee on 10th November. In all of this we have sought to play a constructive role. We recognise the sensitivities involved in this bill, have sought consensus, and looked to help play our part in protecting vulnerable communities from hate crime whilst at the same time protecting fundamental freedoms on which we all depend for our common life. Our approach has never been to just narrowly consider...
SCMO | 26th January 2021 | Blogging
FUNERAL MASS FOR BISHOP VINCENT LOGAN 26/01/2021 It seems almost a cliche to say it, but every human person is a mystery. It’s not surprising though, as it is in God ‘we live and move and have our being’ and he himself is the ultimate mystery, and we have our origin in God. The Catechism reminds us that ‘we are most like unto God in our soul’, and since each one of us is unique in every way, to say we are a mystery seems almost like an understatement. And this mysteriousness is at so many levels. From the biological point of view, we are a mystery because we are formed by the mixing of our parents’ genes and by the environment in which we are planted. From a psychological point of view, we are formed by our parents by our families, by our siblings, friends and relations, by the circumstances of our lives and our loves, our knocks and our disappointments. Most of us have had the good fortune to have been conceived in love and nurtured and nourished in love. Others, though, regrettably haven’t had that great start. And often, for those who are fortunate, there is one great thread of God’s goodness that powerfully shapes us. For most of us, this powerful goodness originates in the Faith passed on to us from our parents, a thread which runs throughout our lives and more than any other influence, arguably, shapes and guides the direction of our lives. Also, for those of us fortunate enough to be baptised, as well as inheriting the common humanity into which we are created in the image and likeness of God, our baptism in Christ also confers on us divine filiation - sonship and daughtership in God - enabling us, as St Paul says, to call God, Abba, our Father. And we spend the rest of our lives on earth finding out what are the consequences for us of this wonderful gift: we never stop learning how to become a better son or a daughter of God. All of this is true of Vincent Paul Logan. Vincent was born on 30th June 1941 to Joseph and Elizabeth Logan (nee Flannigan) into a committed Bathgate Catholic family and - like all Bathgate Catholic bairns – Vincent, together with their other four sons, inherited a strong faith from them. Of Vincent’s brothers James, John, William and Joseph. Only James now is still alive. Later also, Vincent’s four married brothers’ spouses (Esther, Maeve, Grace and Celia) and subsequently their families – nephews (Vincent and Joseph here today), Gerard and Edward, also Paul, now deceased, who like Bishop Vincent, tried his vocation also at Drygrange Seminary, and nieces Elizabeth, Margaret, Lisa and Anne-Marie - All members of this great extended family had their influence on Bishop Vincent throughout his life, just as today they mourn for him, assisting him by their prayers and Masses on the cleansing road to the Heavenly Kingdom. But for a baptised Catholic man, who has in addition received a vocation from the Lord to priesthood, it is also his special relationships, outside the family - school friends, close friends met on life’s journey, fellow seminarians, priest friends and the pastoral and personal relationships a priest makes through his pastoral work, also continued to shape Vincent, up until almost the moment of his death. From his earliest days, Vincent Paul Logan wanted to be a priest. His desire to attend and serve Mass daily, as a young boy with his mother and brothers after their dad went off to work, of course pointed him in the direction of a vocation to priesthood. As a committed Altar Boy, Vincent’s first desire to put himself forward as a candidate for priesthood resulted, as he says himself, in ‘being chased’ in 1952 by Canon Davitt his parish priest because he was too young - only 11. A year later 1 though, in 1953, he went to Blairs, our National Junior Seminary, at 12 and his journey to priesthood began in earnest. Drygrange, the seminary for the Archdiocese of Saint Andrews and Edinburgh was the next step towards priesth...
SCMO | 25th January 2021 | Blogging
Funeral Arrangements for Bishop Vincent Logan The Reception of Bishop Vincent Logan’s Remains, his Requiem Mass and Burial at Balgay Cemetery will be recorded and available to be viewed on the Diocese of Dunkeld website www.dunkelddiocese.co.uk later the same day as the event. The funeral will also be available as a livestream here: https://www.dunkelddiocese.co.uk/livestream-mass/ RECEPTION OF BISHOP VINCENT’S REMAINS WITH VESPERS fromSt Andrew’s Cathedral, Dundee at 5 p.m. on Monday 25th January, 2021. SOLEMN REQUIEM MASS for the Repose of Bishop Vincent’s soul on Tuesday, 26th January 2021, at 12 noon. BURIAL OF BISHOP VINCENT’S REMAINS at Balgay Cemetery, Dundee, on Tuesday, 26th January 2021 from 1.30 p.m. Due to COVID-19 restrictions, with reduced numbers, precedence has been given to Bishop Vincent’s relatives and closest friends. A small number of diocesan clergy, have been invited to concelebrate the Funeral Mass. ENDS Peter Kearney Director Catholic Media Office 0141 221 116807968 122291 pk@scmo.org www.scmo.org Note to Editors: An image of Bishop Logan is available here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/139632090@N07/50833807603/in/album-72157717885467253/ ...