Speaking on Friday 17 September at the national conference of Catholic Head Teachers (CHAPS) at the Hilton Dunblane Hydro Cardinal O Brien defended the provision of Catholic education in Scotland.
Addressing some 160 delegates the Cardinal highlighted the issue of shared
campuses.
He said: The views of local communities are vitally important. Any local
council, in considering a proposal to develop shared campus arrangements for
a specific school, is obliged to consult with the local bishop to seek his
view on the proposal. Many examples of good practice now exist in our
country where the views of the Catholic community have indeed been consulted
and listened to in the construction of shared campus schools.
But I stress that the views of the local community are vitally important “
as the Catholic community was listened to 100 years ago so again we expect
the local authorities to listen to the views of the Catholic community and
we also expect the wishes of the Catholic community to be respected and our
legal safeguards protected and supported by the Scottish Executive.
As our forefathers in the faith in the early 1900s looked forward in
confidence through the safeguards of the 1918 Education Act to a succession
of Catholic schools in our country “ so too do we now look forward at the
beginning of the 2000s at the beginning of a new millennium with confidence
realizing that the safeguards which once existed still exist for
safeguarding discreet Catholic schools where possible and shared campus
arrangements ensuring a Catholic school and a non-denominational school on
one campus where the Catholic partner is indeed a discreet Catholic school
although sharing certain facilities.
The full text of Cardinal O'Brien's homily is shown below.
ENDS
Peter Kearney
Director
Catholic Media Office
5 St. Vincent Place
Glasgow
G1 2DH
0141 221 1168
CHAPS CONFERENCE
(CATHOLIC HEAD TEACHERS ASSOCIATION OF PRIMARY SCHOOLS IN SCOTLAND)
ANNUAL CONFERENCE “ THURSDAY 16TH / FRIDAY 17TH SEPTEMBER 2004
ADDRESS BY CARDINAL KEITH PATRICK O BRIEN
HILTON DUNBLANE HYDRO
Introduction:
It is indeed a privilege being with you all this morning to address your
conference on the final day.
I am sure that you have found your time together beneficial “ appreciating
the input but also having had the opportunity of sharing together with
colleagues old and new.
The general theme of the conference as indicated on the programme is:
Catholic Schools Forward in Faith .
In my address to you this morning when I had been asked to look to the
future “ I would like the address of this particular talk to be quite
simply: Look to the future with confidence!
I give three headings for my address “ perhaps based on my years as a
teacher and wanting to break everything down into easy teaching blocks!
Where are we now?
I would ask you to consider first of all just where we are now in Scotland
at the beginning of this third millennium. We began our meeting yesterday
(Thursday) on the feast of St. Ninian, which takes us back 1600 years ” to
the roots of Christianity in Scotland. It is appropriate that this should be
the starting point for a brief reflection on the journey of faith our nation
has taken since Ninian brought the Christian message to these shores those
1600 years ago. As the centuries passed, the tide of Christianity he led
would flow until it covered the entirety of Scotland in a ˜sea of faith . In
more recent decades that tide has ebbed dramatically and the ˜sea of
Christianity in which we were once immerged has receded. It has often been
replaced by a new tide of rampant secular materialism which has left us on a
sea of self-centred consumerism where we often struggle to chart a course.
It is now more than ever before that we need the moral and spiritual compass
that our faith can provide.
Clearly, things have changed - and changed rapidly since I was a young boy
growing up in Ireland and then in Scotland, Glasgow and Edinburgh. You too,
will be aware of many changes in our society.
We also realise that we are not living in a Catholic society “ but rather
one in which there are a considerable number of members of other Churches.
Many of them share some of our beliefs and are happy for their children to
attend their schools. Just a few months ago I was asked to address the
General Assembly of the Church of Scotland. I was warmly received as always
and was able to speak to the Moderator and the delegates assembled there of
our universal Christian heritage; of our desire to serve together; and also
of the common prayer, which we shared.
There are also those of other faiths. I regularly attend meetings with
leaders of other faiths, such meetings being organized by our Scottish Inter
Faith Council. Men and women from different faiths gather together for some
time of quiet; for sharing our ideas; and for ensuring that our young people
are brought up in a society in which their faiths can be appreciated and
valued and a society in which they can appreciate and share in the faiths of
others. They too often greatly appreciate the fact that high moral standards
are maintained at our schools.
But there are those of no faith at all “ who see your schools as a sign of
contradiction to their own lack of faith and lack of any beliefs.
At one time those who did not practice any particular religion would in some
way or another have been rather ashamed of it. The opposite is true today!
Faithlessness and atheism being a badge of honour for many! It is rather
frightening to hear those who are leaders in society say forcibly: Of
course we are living in a secular society now!
In our schools, primary and secondary, we must be fully aware of the
background from which our people come and aware also of the powerful social
and cultural influences to which they are subject. Catholic Bishops know
what they want - I ask you to be exactly the same and to know what you want
and appreciate everything that is good about our Catholic schools.
The recently produced ˜Charter for Catholic Schools in Scotland has
received a great deal of positive attention from all associated with our
schooling. There it is clearly stated that: The mission of the Catholic
school is to develop as a community of faith and learning, providing the
highest quality of education, and offering formation through the promotion
of Gospel values, through celebration and worship, and through service to
the common good . And the Charter also states: All staff appointed to a
Catholic school are expected to support and promote the aims, mission,
values and ethos of the school, as illustrated in the Charter .
The heritage which is our buildings:
Having spoken of the increasing secular society in which we live I would
like you also to think of our Catholic Christian heritage.
As the increasingly growing Catholic community sought to bring up their
children in the Catholic Faith, they endeavoured to build Catholic schools.
In the early 1900s there were nearly 200 Catholic schools, which had been
built and maintained by Catholic parents for their children. However as a
result of the 1918 Education Act these Catholic schools had been absorbed
into the new State System, taken over by the State in return for certain
safeguards in Law.
Difficulties arose in 1920 when the first of a series of petitions went to
Stirling asking the County to provide a Catholic school for the 200 Catholic
children in the Bonnybridge area. The reply was to become monotonous “ there
is ample accommodation in the State schools in that area. However the
Catholics wished a Catholic school for their children “ and the Scottish
Education Department was asked to compel Stirling to build the school and a
dispute continued which was talked about throughout the length and breadth
of Scotland, in the outer and inner houses of the Court of Session in
Edinburgh and the House of Lords at Westminster. After some years of dispute
a final decision was made that Stirling County Council would have to accept
the transfer of St Joseph s Primary School, Bonnybridge and all the
financial responsibilities involved. That school was built by parents who
intended their children to be educated within the atmosphere of a truly
Catholic school “ built on the rock of faith, faith in God and faith in the
basic fair-mindedness of their fellow men. The result of the famous
Bonnybridge Case was to ensure that the Catholic School system following
on the 1918 Education Act would continue to help in the building of Catholic
schools wherever there was a reasonable cause for asking for them.
We have no reason to fear any possible change in the Laws of our Land.
Perhaps there is more to fear for the Church of today in that there are some
members of our Church and many outside our Church who in public statements
seem to be prepared to water down, even to cast overboard, the legal
provisions and safeguards for which our parents fought. We must remember
that the driving force behind the Bonnybridge Case was the reasonable will
of the parents to have their children educated in the Catholic school. The
source of whatever authority priests and teachers have in the field of
education comes from the trust placed in them by the parents of the children
they serve.
One particular situation arising today particularly where there is a small
Catholic population along with smaller local authorities is the question of
shared campus schools. In a briefing document on shared campus schools of
February 2004 the Scottish Catholic Education Service clearly states: Every
Catholic school community is expected to show its distinctiveness in its
teaching programmes, in its forming of relationships, in its culture and
ethos, in its values, beliefs and assumptions, and in the opportunities it
provides for prayer and worship .
The briefing rightly goes on to state that: It is undoubtedly more
difficult to provide this distinctive form of education in a shared campus
context where two distinctive school communities will live together as
neighbours but not a s one family .
Of course it is for this reason that it is the Church s Policy to support,
in almost all cases, the provision of discreet Catholic schools to meet the
needs of each and every community. The Policy is not intended to suggest a
detachment from social communion and harmony. Rather it is vital if the
Church is to be able to develop the distinctive provision, which has been
highly valued and highly successful.
The views of local communities are vitally important. Any local council, in
considering a proposal to develop shared campus arrangements for a specific
school, is obliged to consult with the local bishop to seek his view on the
proposal. Many examples of good practice now exist in our country where
the views of the Catholic community have indeed been consulted and listened
to in the construction of shared campus schools.
But I stress that the views of the local community are vitally important “
as the Catholic community was listened to 100 years ago so again we expect
the local authorities to listen to the views of the Catholic community and
we also expect the wishes of the Catholic community to be respected and our
legal safeguards protected and supported by the Scottish Executive.
As our forefathers in the faith in the early 1900s looked forward in
confidence through the safeguards of the 1918 Education Act to a succession
of Catholic schools in our country “ so too do we now look forward at the
beginning of the 2000s at the beginning of a new millennium with confidence
realizing that the safeguards which once existed still exist for
safeguarding discreet Catholic schools where possible and shared campus
arrangements ensuring a Catholic school and a non-denominational school on
one campus where the Catholic partner is indeed a discreet Catholic school
although sharing certain facilities.
The heritage which is our children:
Obviously, in speaking to primary school teachers I know and am fully aware
of your important vocation. However, I appreciate that with me you realise
that parents are the first and primary educators of their children informed
by the teaching of the Church.
If the heritage of our buildings is important perhaps we can rightly say
that our heritage of our children is even more important.
Consequently, we realise that in our Catholic schools we must have
academically qualified and highly trained teachers interested not just in
teaching as a subject but vitally interested in the formation of the faith
of the young people entrusted to their care. It is indeed a heavy
responsibility, which lies on the shoulders of teachers in our Catholic
schools “ but I realise that many of you share the motto, which I adopted
when I was appointed Archbishop:
Serve the Lord with gladness . Nothing is more stimulating, nothing is more
challenging, nothing is more fulfilling than forming young people, not only
academically but also morally and spiritually.
It is to assist you in your own particular vocations that I have spoken out
recently about the forthcoming Sexual Education Strategy of the Scottish
Executive.
I am fully aware that a consultation process has already taken place and I
know that many of you will have responded either as individuals, or as
members of your school staff. Many school boards and parents associations
have similarly responded.
I have been asked why I have spoken out so strongly in recent weeks
following on the consultation process. The answer is perfectly clear. I want
all peoples of goodwill to have a further opportunity of entering into
debate and I think that I have stimulated such debate in the past few weeks.
Although over 1,000 responses were received to the consultation, it is
difficult to describe this as ˜wide public debate bearing in mind that a
similar consultation on ˜Smoking in Public Places has to date generated
over 27,000 responses! As one observer put it: There has been more debate
about this sexual education strategy in the 48 hours since Cardinal O Brien
first spoke than in the 48 weeks previously! Consequently, I make no
apology for bringing this debate to the attention of the public in general
and my own Catholic community in particular and would encourage wider debate
and discussion on the topic, before any decisions are made by the Scottish
Executive and a policy is produced and laid before us for implementation.
Secondly, I have become increasingly aware of worries among parents in our
Catholic community and from many people of goodwill about proposals floated
in the consultative document. Safeguards must exist for all our children
from nursery to the top years of secondary school. It is for this reason
that I have asked clarification on a number of issues which are of intense
interest to me and to those involved in our Catholic schools as well as to
others who have written to me. Plans to improve links between schools and
sexual health services mentioned in Para 4.20 of the document cause many
people concern especially in relation to the distribution in confidence of
the Morning After Pill to children.
Proposals in Para 4.17 of the consultation document have caused me to ask
for confirmation that sex and relationships education resources and
approaches which use suggestive role-playing, graphic imagery or intimate
questioning will not be used in pre-school or primary schools and that no
approach will be used in isolation from any guidance on basic moral values.
Knowing that in speaking to you I am also speaking to many parents, I have
also asked for confirmation that the morning after pill will not be made
available in confidence to school children without parental consent, either
within schools or facilitated by health workers in and around schools. It is
relatively easy to state that this pill will not be given out within schools
but in a recent article in a national paper it is stated: Health workers
are routinely arranging for Scottish schoolgirls to receive emergency
contraception despite a vow by the First Minister that the morning after
pill will not be handed out in schools . The newspaper investigation has
apparently uncovered numerous ways in which health professionals bypass
Government Policy to provide children with the morning after pill without
their parents ever being told.
In our Catholic schools we must have a commitment on the part of all those
working in our schools to uphold the moral teaching, faith, tradition and
sacramental life of our Church. To this end, I have asked, that the right
of denominational schools to set protocols governing the work of health
professionals be respected
From the beginning of Christianity emphasis has been placed on a stable
relationship in marriage as being the best way in which children are
educated and formed. Consequently, I have appealed for abstinence-based
approaches to be used with regard to sex education; I have urged fidelity in
marriage; and have asked for any sex and relationships education to be set
at all times in a moral context.
We must be aware that others who do not observe our standards and our moral
values are constantly seeking to erode them and affect not only our children
but the morality of society.
In our Catholic schools we must set the highest standards of education and
formation. I recommend to you the Guidance Notes for Teaching Relationships
and Moral Education produced by the Catholic Education. These guidance
notes should be the basis for all that we are endeavouring to teach in our
Catholic schools in this area. Various excellent courses have been produced
“ the Scottish Catholic Education Service will be assessing these and I
commend their future recommendations to you all.
Conclusion:
I have spoken this morning of the society in which we live; of the Christian
heritage we value, of the precious heritage, which are our Catholic schools;
and of our children an even more important heritage.
Your vocation as teachers and leaders, in Catholic primary schools, is a
precious and vital one. As I have been called to my vocation, so you have
been called to yours.
Together we must strengthen our desire to live our faith as best we can and
to transmit that faith to those we teach.
In the words of one of our familiar hymns, words taken from sacred scripture
we are taught: When God is for us who can be against! God is indeed for us
“ no one can be against “ strong in our faith and in our commitment we do
indeed go forward evermore confidently into the future, a future in which
each one of us has an important role to play as a follower of Jesus Christ.
ENDS
Cardinal addresses Catholic headteachers
Subscribe to Updates
If you enjoyed this, why not subscribe to free email updates ?
Subscribe to News updates
Enter your email address to be notified of new posts:Alternatively, you can subscribe via RSS 
We never share or sell your email address to anyone.
Recent Posts
SCMO | 21st September 2020 | Blogging
BCOS Meeting 7 September 2020 Conference Report: The meeting was held over two sessions via Teams. All members of the Bishops’ Conference participated. Sir Harry Burns contributed for a part of the morning session which addressed in detail the implications of the ongoing COVID-19 restrictions on places of worship. In his contribution, Sir Harry advised that the existing limits on maximum attendance of 50 for Mass and 20 for Weddings and Funerals were without scientific foundation and he could see no logical reason for them. Following a wide-ranging discussion on this, it was clear that this perspective was unanimously held. Sir Harry advised that he would raise the matter with officials and ministers in the coming days and report back to the conference. (Other representatives of the Conference have raised similar points). He also spoke of the possible trajectory of the virus over the next few months, advising that the concerns of the Government’s scientific advisors, were that a rise in positive tests among younger people, who are unlikely to require hospitalisation, at present could in the coming weeks spread to the elderly and vulnerable, with serious consequences for the NHS. He updated the bishops on progress being made towards a vaccine and suggested the timescales involved were likely to mean a viable vaccine could be available by December for use early in 2021. The bishops thanked Sir Harry for his contributions and advice. Archbishop Cushley updated the conference on the ongoing discussions about the disposal of assets belonging to ACTS. He described three options which had been tabled at a previous meeting of the successor body to ACTS, the Scottish Christian Leaders Forum (SCLF) after some debate a fourth option was proposed and received wide support, it was that any remaining funds be dispersed on a pro rata basis to the founding members of ACTS. Archbishop Cushley undertook to take this position back to the SCLF. A discussion on a number of liturgical matters followed, led by Bishop Gilbert and based upon his “Report on Matters Liturgical to the Bishops Conference” which covered: The final stage of proof-reading of the Ordo, the proposal that St Mary of the Cross MacKillop, the first canonised Australian saint, be kept as an optional memorial in the Scottish Proper of Saints, the proposal that, given the devotion in Scotland, the optional memorial of Our Lady of Lourdes, 11 February, be raised to the status of an obligatory memorial. The third change proposed to the Scottish Proper of Saints was the insertion of St John Henry Newman as an optional memorial. All these changes were endorsed. The conference heard that the next meeting of the National Liturgical Commission will be in the second half of October and the next meeting of ICEL was scheduled for 8-12 February 2021. Bishop Gilbert proposed that a renewed emphasis on the Eucharist would be opportune. This was agreed with. There was discussion over the modality, timing and preparatory work required for this. A discussion followed on the timing and the detail of such a move with one of the bishops agreeing to prepare a basic initial text on this subject. Bishop Keenan presented a report on Seminary Provision proposing a range of options to be researched in terms of viability as serious options for the formation of men for the Priesthood. At the November BCOS Meeting each option would be discussed, in the light of the information provided, with a view to discerning the 3 most viable options. There would then be consultation on these options before a final decision is made by the Bishops in February/March 2021. Bishop Keenan also presented a report on Transitional Deacons and led a lively discussion on aspects of the model of priestly formation proposed by the Congregation for the Clergy and the recent Ratio. On behalf of the Pastoral Ministry Group, Michael McGrath present...
SCMO | 04th August 2020 | Blogging
Statement on nuclear weapons from the Bishops of Scotland and England & Wales Tuesday 4 August 2020 During his historic visit to Japan last year, Pope Francis declared that “the use of atomic energy for purposes of war is immoral, just as the possession of atomic weapons is immoral”. Seventy-five years on from the unprecedented and horrific destruction of life at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, we are called to reflect prayerfully upon the UK’s own possession of nuclear weapons. Pope Francis reiterated that the threat of mutual destruction, the massive loss of innocent lives and the annihilation of any future for our common home, is completely incompatible with our efforts to build peace. “If we really want to build a more just and secure society, we must let the weapons fall from our hands”, said the Pope. He also reminded us that it is unjust to continue squandering precious resources on manufacturing, maintaining and upgrading ever more destructive technology. The cost of nuclear weapons should be measured not only in the lives destroyed through their use, but also the suffering of the poorest and most vulnerable people, who could have benefited were such vast sums of public money invested in the Common Good of society instead. The Scottish and English and Welsh bishops' conferences have in the past called on the UK government to forsake its own nuclear weapons. We therefore recommit ourselves to the abolition of these weapons and to the Holy Father’s call to pray each day “for the conversion of hearts and for the triumph of a culture of life, reconciliation and fraternity. A fraternity that can recognize and respect diversity in the quest for a common destiny.” +William Nolan, Bishop of Galloway and on behalf of the Commission for Justice and Peace of the Bishops’ Conference of Scotland. +Declan Lang, Bishop of Clifton and Chairman of the international Affairs Department of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of England and Wales ENDS Peter Kearney Director Catholic Media Office 0141 221 116807968 122291 pk@scmo.org www.scmo.org ...
SCMO | 29th July 2020 | Blogging
New Hate Crime Bill – the freedom to disagree must be protected, say Scotland’s Bishops Wednesday 29 July 2020The Bishops’ Conference of Scotland has responded to the Scottish Government’s new Hate Crime and Public Order Bill. In a submission to the Scottish Parliament Justice Committee the Conference has stated that any new law must be ‘carefully weighed against fundamental freedoms, such as the right to free speech, freedom of expression, and freedom of thought, conscience and religion.’ The bill proposes to modernise, consolidate and extend hate crime legislation in Scotland, including introducing a new offence of stirring up hatred, possession of inflammatory material, and new protection of freedom of expression provisions in relation to religion and sexual orientation. Commenting on the submission, the Director of the Catholic Parliamentary Office, Anthony Horan said;“Whilst acknowledging that stirring up of hatred is morally wrong and supporting moves to discourage and condemn such behaviour the bishops have expressed concerns about the lack of clarity around definitions and a potentially low threshold for committing an offence, which they fear, could lead to a ‘deluge of vexatious claims’.” “A new offence of possessing inflammatory material could even render material such as the Bible and the Catechism of the Catholic Church...inflammatory. The Catholic Church’s understanding of the human person, including the belief that sex and gender are not fluid and changeable, could fall foul of the new law. Allowing for respectful debate, means avoiding censorship and accepting the divergent views and multitude of arguments inhabiting society.”Mr Horan added; “The Church believes that fundamental freedoms must be protected, as the right to exercise freedom, especially in moral and religious matters, is ‘an inalienable requirement of the dignity of the human person’ and ‘a right that must be recognised and protected by civil authority, always within the limits of the common good and public order’. The courts have noted that the freedom to shock, offend and disturb, as well as the contentious and unwelcome are protected by the right to freedom of expression, and the bishops have declared that freedom of expression provisions must be robust enough to protect the freedom to disagree.Mr Horan concluded; “The bishops decry so-called ‘cancel culture’ in their submission, expressing deep concern at the ‘hunting down of those who disagree with prominent orthodoxies with the intention to expunge the non-compliant from public discourse and with callous disregard for their livelihoods’. They say that ‘no single section of society has dominion over acceptable and unacceptable speech or expression’ and urged the law to be proportionate and fair and allow for respectful debate and tolerance lest we become an ‘intolerant, illiberal society’.”ENDSPeter Kearney Director Catholic Media Office 0141 221 1168 07968 122291 pk@scmo.org www.scmo.orgNote to Editors:The full text of the submission to the consultation is shown below:Catholic Church responds to Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Bill ConsultationJustice Committee – Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) BillConsolidation2. The Bill brings together the majority of existing hate crime laws into one piece of legislation. Do you believe there is merit in the consolidation of existing hate crime laws and should all such laws be covered?We agree that there is merit in consolidating existing hate crime laws.Other forms of crime not included in the Bill5. Do you think that sectarianism should have been specifically addressed in this Bill and defined in hate crime legislation? For example, should a statutory aggravation relating to sectarianism or a standalone offence have been created and added?Existing legislation, including existing statutory aggravations, adequately covers offences relating...
SCMO | 24th July 2020 | Blogging
A New Lectionary for Scotland 24 July 2020 Scotland’s Catholic Bishops have approved the preparation of a new Lectionary (a book of readings used at Mass) to update and replace the three volume Lectionary in use in the dioceses of England and Wales, Scotland and Ireland for almost 30 years. The current Lectionary was first published in 1981 using the Jerusalem Bible (1966) as its base text. Commenting on the publication, Bishop Hugh Gilbert, President of the Bishops’ Conference of Scotland said; “In reaching a decision about a translation for the Lectionary, the Bishops’ Conference of Scotland itself considered the values they would most expect a Lectionary to embody, for example, accuracy, dignity, facility of proclamation, and accessibility. The Catholic Edition of the English Standard Version (ESV) Bible, published in 2018, will be used as the base text for the new translation, it has been accepted by the Bishops of England and Wales as the basis for their own Lectionary and the Scottish Bishops voted at their July 2020 meeting to use it as well. It makes practical and pastoral good sense for the same translation to be used in Scotland, England and Wales.” Bishop Gilbert added; “The National Liturgy Commission has looked closely at the issue of a new Lectionary and hope that its publication will keep the biblical word alive and active for the holy People of God and shape thought and culture in our changing world.” ENDS Peter Kearney Director Catholic Media Office 0141 221 1168 07968 122291 pk@scmo.org www.scmo.org Note to Editors: 1. The work of editing and publishing the new Lectionary is expected to take several years. 2. A full statement on the new Lectionary from the National Liturgy Commission is shown below. The Lectionary and the Word of God The Church, throughout her history, sets before the faithful the riches of Sacred Scripture to be read and broken open in worship and for use in private devotions. The Second Vatican Council, in an effort to restore the practice of the early centuries of the Church of a continuous reading of a breadth of Scripture, promulgated a new lectionary for the Roman Rite, with a revised structure and a wide selection of Scripture texts. St Paul writes: “All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.” (2 Tim 3:16-17). Thus, the Church has always venerated the divine Scriptures as she venerated the Body of the Lord, in so far as she never ceases, particularly in the sacred liturgy, to partake of the bread of life and to offer it to the faithful from the one table of the Word of God and the Body of Christ (Dei Verbum, 21). By listening to and understanding the Scriptures we encounter God and understand how he reveals himself to us, enabling us to grow in faith. But we do not listen alone. Through a faithful proclamation of the word of God within the tradition of the Church we benefit from the holiness and wisdom of all the faithful who have gone before us. According to the General Introduction to the Lectionary: through his word, God unceasingly calls to mind and extends the plan of salvation, which achieves its fullest expression in the liturgy. The liturgical celebration becomes therefore the continuing, complete, and effective presentation of God’s word. Developments leading to a revised translation of the Lectionary The three volume Lectionary in use in the dioceses of England and Wales, Scotland and Ireland was first published in 1981 using the Jerusalem Bible (1966) and the Grail Psalms (1963). It was subsequently re-printed, although is presently out of print. In recent times, English-speaking Bishops’ Conferences worldwide have approved a new translation of the Book of Psalms – “The Abbey Psalms” – for the Liturgy of the Hours. This new translation is the w...