Church leaders urge withdraw of controversial section of Hate Crime Bill

Church leaders urge withdraw of controversial section of Hate Crime Bill to allow “adequate consideration”

 

Friday 12 February

 

An unprecedented alliance of Catholic and Evangelical church leaders are urging the Scottish Government to drop part of its proposed Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Bill to allow time for “detailed consideration of crucial provisions.” The Bill, which would potentially criminalise any criticism of Transgender ideology has been criticised by the Catholic Church, the Free Church of Scotland and the Evangelical Alliance.

 

In a letter addressed today (Friday 12 February) to the Cabinet Secretary for Justice Humza Yousaf, the church leaders call for greater protections for freedom of expression and say:

 

“We believe that people should be completely free to disagree with our faith in any way, including mocking and ridiculing us. We are convinced that our faith is true and has a sufficient evidential basis to withstand any criticism, we therefore welcome open debate.” 

 

By contrast, concerns are raised that any disagreement with or criticism of Transgender identity could fall foul of the new law, if passed in its current form. The church leaders point out, that “Transgender identity has been subject of extensive and emotional public discussion. Such free discussion and criticism of views is vital as society wrestles with these ideas.” They warn however, that they “cannot accept that any position or opinion at variance with the proposition that sex (or gender) is fluid and changeable should not be heard.”

 

The letter marks the first time Catholic, Free Church and Evangelical Alliance leaders have jointly petitioned the Scottish Government and sought a meeting with the Cabinet Secretary for Justice. Supporting “open and honest debate” the letter ends with an assertion, that “A right to claim that binary sex does not exist or is fluid must be matched with a right to disagree with that opinion; and protection from prosecution for holding it.” As well as a warning that: ”The Parliament now has approximately four weeks to complete the passage of the bill. This is extraordinarily tight and risks inadequate and ill-thought through legislation being passed. No workable solutions to issues of freedom of expression have so far been suggested. If no such solutions can be found we hope the Scottish Government will now consider withdrawing the stirring up hatred offences in Part 2 of the bill to allow more detailed consideration and discussion and to ensure freedom of expression provisions, which enshrine free and open debate, are afforded the scrutiny they require.”

 

ENDS

 

Peter Kearney 
Director 
Catholic Media Office 
5 St. Vincent Place 
Glasgow 
G1 2DH 
0141 221 1168
07968 122291 
pk@scmo.org 
www.scmo.org

 

 

Notes to Editors:

 

The full text of the letter is shown below.

Humza Yousaf MSP

Cabinet Secretary for Justice

The Scottish Government

St. Andrew's House

Edinburgh

EH1 3DG

 

Friday 12th February 2021

 

Dear Mr Yousaf,

 

 

Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Bill – Stage 2 amendments

 

We are writing to you as representatives of three communities of churches in Scotland in relation to the progress of the Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) bill at Stage 2 and to ask if we may be able to meet with you in the coming days in relation to this.

 

As you know we have engaged extensively throughout the bill process including a number of meetings with you and your officials, and all gave oral evidence to the Justice Committee on 10th November. In all of this we have sought to play a constructive role. We recognise the sensitivities involved in this bill, have sought consensus, and looked to help play our part in protecting vulnerable communities from hate crime whilst at the same time protecting fundamental freedoms on which we all depend for our common life. Our approach has never been to just narrowly consider the needs of our own communities only but rather to look at the impact of this bill across society.

 

As you know from the outset, we have had a number of concerns about this bill and these have been well represented in our evidence. These included plans to create new offences without intent, offences related to inflammatory material and the protection of freedom of speech. We are grateful for Scottish Government and Justice Committee consideration of these and the improvements that have been made to the bill in these first two areas.

 

However, central to the impact of this bill has always been the protections for freedom of expression. We were therefore very concerned at the approach outlined at the Stage 2 committee meeting on 2nd February that appears to take an entirely new approach to this issue with only a few weeks remaining until the bill must be passed at Stage 3. It appears that after eight months of discussion and scrutiny of the bill the approach to date has been discarded in a few short days, with very little time remaining for further discussion and engagement with stakeholders.

 

As Christians, we do not always agree with one another and know that many do not necessarily share or even understand our beliefs, but we are utterly committed to the free and open exchange of ideas in society. We believe that people should be completely free to disagree with our faith in any way, including mocking and ridiculing us. We are convinced that our faith is true and has a sufficient evidential basis to withstand any criticism, we therefore welcome open debate. 

 

We therefore welcome amendments to Section 11 of the bill which clarify that, in relation to religious belief, mere expressions of antipathy, dislike, ridicule and insult are not, on their own, criminal behaviour together with the fact that this is extended to those of no belief as well. We support a robust approach to freedom of expression in relation to religion in the Bill, in accordance with Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights and we urge the Scottish Parliament to move forward with these amendments to ensure the rights of everyone in society to freely express their beliefs.

 

However, we are very concerned that a similarly clear and robust approach has not been taken in relation to other areas of the bill, as was previously proposed, in favour of what appears to be a catch all freedom of expression statement on the face of this bill. Whilst any statement to that effect would be welcome there are very real dangers that this general nature amounts to a watering down of protections as the detail of specific protections is lost, meaning that there would be continued uncertainty for prosecutors, courts and most importantly the general public, about the operation of the bill. Those concerns, which Ministers, officials and committee members have spent months trying to address, now appear at risk of being discarded in a rush to find a general statement that can be agreed. We note the commitment of all parties to reset discussions on the freedom of expression provisions in the bill. However, we are disappointed that these months of discussions on the bill, including extensive input from stakeholders, now appears to be in danger of being set aside.

 

Specifically, we have concerns in relation to the approach taken to Section 12 in relation to sexual orientation and the approach taken to the issue of transgender identity – an issue raised almost weekly during the committee evidence sessions. In both these areas we must all be careful to distinguish between hateful, nasty, vicious, or malevolent attacks on the person on one hand, and disagreement or dispute with an ideological position on the other.

 

While welcoming the inclusion of protection for discussion of criticism of sexual conduct and practices, we urge the Scottish Parliament to extend this to also allow for discussion and criticism of marriage which concerns the sex of the parties to the marriage. When marriage between parties of the same sex was introduced in Scotland assurance was given that no religious body would be forced to conduct them, implicit in that assurance was protection for those who expressed doctrinal disagreement with such marriages.

 

We also welcomed proposed amendments in relation to a new clause relating to Freedom of Expression in relation to transgender identity. Transgender identity has been subject of extensive and emotional public discussion. Such free discussion and criticism of views is vital as society wrestles with these ideas. While we acknowledge the difficulties and struggles experienced by those with Gender Dysphoria and are acutely aware of the sensitivities involved from our own pastoral care settings, we cannot accept that any position or opinion at variance with the proposition that sex (or gender) is fluid and changeable should not be heard. Open and honest debate on the very essence of the human person should never be stifled. We believe provision must therefore be made in the bill for discussion and criticism of views on transgender identity without fear of criminal sanctions. A right to claim that binary sex does not exist or is fluid must be matched with a right to disagree with that opinion; and protection from prosecution for holding it.

 

The Parliament now has approximately four weeks to complete the passage of the bill. This is extraordinarily tight and risks inadequate and ill-thought through legislation being passed. No workable solutions to issues of freedom of expression have so far been suggested. If no such solutions can be found we hope the Scottish Government will now consider withdrawing the stirring up hatred offences in Part 2 of the bill to allow more detailed consideration and discussion and to ensure freedom of expression provisions, which enshrine free and open debate, are afforded the scrutiny they require.

 

We look forward to hearing from you and hope to be able to meet with you soon.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

 

Anthony Horan, Director of the Catholic Parliamentary Office of the Bishops’ Conference of Scotland

Stephen Allison Assistant Clerk of the Free Church of Scotland.

Fred Drummond, National Director of the Evangelical Alliance Scotland

 

 

(CC Mr Tomkins, Convener of Scottish Parliament Justice Committee)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to:
Like   Back to Top   Seen 392 times   Liked 1 times

Subscribe to Updates

If you enjoyed this, why not subscribe to free email updates ?

Subscribe to News updates

Enter your email address to be notified of new posts:

Subscribe to:

Alternatively, you can subscribe via RSS RSS

‹ Return to News

We never share or sell your email address to anyone.

I've already subscribed / don't show me this again

Recent Posts

Catholic Church campaigns against Assisted Suicide Proposal

| 5 days ago | Blogging

  Catholic Church campaigns against Assisted Suicide Proposal   The Catholic Church in Scotland has restated its opposition to a new attempt to legalise assisted suicide. While the church together with a wide range of other organisations supports the Care Not Killing (CNK) group it has separately criticised the prospect of another consultation on the subject.   Director of the Catholic Parliamentary Office, Anthony Horan said;   “This is the third time in little over a decade that the Scottish Parliament has been asked to legalise assisted suicide. Despite the underlying arguments not having changed we are once again being confronted with the frightening proposal that doctors be legally permitted to help patients kill themselves by providing them with a lethal cocktail of drugs.”    “Over the last eighteen months society has been reoriented to protect the most ill and vulnerable in response to the pandemic. Legalising assisted suicide moves in the opposite direction: putting immeasurable pressure on vulnerable people including those with disabilities to end their lives prematurely, for fear of being a financial, emotional or care burden on others.”    Mr Horan restated the Catholic church position that “Once passed, incremental extensions and the removal of protections and safeguards are inevitable and have happened everywhere legislation has been passed.”   He called on MSP’s to “prevent suicide, not assist it” and urged Catholics to “engage with elected representatives to warn them of the serious dangers of assisted suicide and the deadly and irreparable consequences of its legalisation.”   ENDS   Peter Kearney  Director  Catholic Media Office  Tel:    0141 221 1168 Mob:  07968 122291 ISDN: 0141 204 4956  pk@scmo.org  www.scmo.org   Note to Editors:   A briefing on Assisted Suicide - https://rcpolitics.org/assisted-suicide/ Is being circulated to Scotland’s 500 Catholic parishes, urging parishioners to contact their MSP’s asking them to oppose the proposal....

POPE ‘SUPPORTIVE’ OF PLANS TO RELOCATE SCOTS COLLEGE

| 7 days ago | Blogging

POPE ‘SUPPORTIVE’ OF PLANS TO RELOCATE SCOTS COLLEGE

POPE ‘SUPPORTIVE’ OF PLANS TO RELOCATE SCOTS COLLEGE 20 September 2021   Plans to relocate the Pontifical Scots College in Rome have been backed by Pope Francis. Archbishop Leo Cushley met with the Holy Father at the Vatican on Saturday (18 September) to discuss the proposed move. Speaking after the meeting, Archbishop Cushley said: “Pope Francis expressed his full support for the intentions of the Bishops’ Conference of Scotland to move the college into Rome city centre.  “I was delighted to hear that and I know my fellow bishops will be too.”   The decision to relocate seminary, where young men in Scotland train for the priesthood, was announced in December after building upgrades were deemed too costly. The college is on Via Cassia, around 10km from the city centre. The Bishops’ aim to sell the building and believe a more central location is the best option for the formation needs of the community and for future provision.   Archbishop Cushley added: “Saying goodbye, the Pope asked for our prayers for him, which I was happy to promise him on behalf of Scotland’s Catholics.   ENDS   Peter Kearney  Director  Catholic Media Office  5 St. Vincent Place  Glasgow  G1 2DH  Tel:    0141 221 1168 Mob:  07968 122291 ISDN: 0141 204 4956  pk@scmo.org  www.scmo.org   Note to Editors:   Archbishop Cushley is in Rome this week for the 50th anniversary of the council of European Bishops’ Conferences at the Plenary Assembly in the presence of Pope Francis.   Change email address / Leave mailing list Powered by YMLP ...

Catholic Bishops and organisations call for an end to the arms trade 

| 07th September 2021 | Blogging

Catholic Bishops and organisations call for an end to the arms trade   7 September 2021   Catholic Bishops and organisations have voiced their opposition to the arms trade, as the UK prepares to host one of the world’s largest arms fairs next week.      The DSEI arms fair takes place in London 14-17 September, bringing together governments and military delegations from across the world with more than 1,500 companies selling guns, bombs, and other weaponry.      A statement signed by Catholic Bishops from across the UK, took up the call of Pope Francis to end the arms trade. Commenting on behalf of the Bishops’ Conference of Scotland, Bishop William Nolan, Bishop of Galloway said;    “Tragically, conflicts fueled by the trade harm the world’s poorest communities, they force people to flee their homes as refugees, and they have devastating consequences for our environment.  We urge governments across the world, including our own, to commit themselves to ending the global arms trade and instead pursue the path of peace and reconciliation.”    ENDS    Peter Kearney Director Catholic Media Office 0141 221 116807968 122291 pk@scmo.org www.scmo.org   Note to Editors:  The full statement is shown below;     Full statement:      As the UK again prepares to host one of the world’s largest arms fairs, we recall the message of Pope Francis: “Why are deadly weapons being sold to those who plan to inflict untold suffering on individuals and society? Sadly, the answer, as we all know, is simply for money: money that is drenched in blood, often innocent blood. In the face of this shameful and culpable silence, it is our duty to confront the problem and to stop the arms trade.”       We recognise the right of every country to defend itself against attack, but we must never ignore, or allow ourselves to become complicit in, the destruction of human life and violations of human dignity made possible by the sale of weaponry. The conflicts fueled by this trade harm the poorest communities, force people to flee their homes as refugees, and have devastating consequences for our environment.       We stand alongside all those people of goodwill who are peacefully campaigning against the arms trade and join in prayer with the Holy Father that our leaders may commit themselves to ending it, in pursuit of peace and care for our whole human family.      Signatories:     Bishop William Nolan, President - Justice and Peace Scotland   Bishop Declan Lang, Chair – Department of International Affairs, Catholic Bishops’ Conference of England and Wales   Bishop William Kenney, lead bishop for peace and disarmament issues, Catholic Bishops’ Conference of England and Wales   Bishop Paul McAleenan, lead bishop for migrants and refugees, Catholic Bishops’ Conference of England and Wales   Ann Farr, Chair, Pax Christi England and Wales   Marian Pallister, Chair, Pax Christi Scotland   Christine Allen, Director, CAFOD   Alistair Dutton, Director, SCIAF   Paul Southgate, Chair, National Justice and Peace Network         ...

Scottish Government accused of ‘riding roughshod over democracy’

| 01st September 2021 | Blogging

Scottish Government accused of ‘riding roughshod over democracy’ 1 September 2021 The Scottish government has been accused of breaking with convention and deliberately diminishing the views of thousands of individuals who responded to a consultation on home abortions in July. In a strongly worded critique, the Director of the Catholic Parliamentary Office, Anthony Horan has condemned the decision to nullify the responses of the majority of people who took part in the consultation and opposed the government’s stance. Mr Horan writes; “Only 17 per cent of submissions to the home abortion consultation supported home abortions being made permanent. A total of 61 per cent wanted them ended and 74 per cent believed they had a negative impact on the safety of women. Additionally, more than 600 medical professionals signed an open letter to the Scottish, Welsh and English governments calling for an end to “at-home” abortion because of concerns about abortions occurring beyond the ten-week limit and about women and girls being coerced into an abortion against their will.”  Adding;  “Yet, despite this, the Scottish Government shockingly sought to downplay those individuals who raised concerns, labelling a significant number of the responses as “organised by pro-life or faith groups” as if to downgrade their importance. The same treatment was not given to pro-abortion groups.” Mr Horan describes the Scottish Government’s publication last week of its Women’s Health Plan which sets out the government’s intention to “make telephone and video consultation universally available as an option for abortion services” as a “deeply concerning” development which undermines the government’s own commitment to “commission an independent evaluation to assess the effectiveness of the current approach, including in relation to safety”.  Mr Horan describes the Scottish government as being “hell bent on making the (home abortion) arrangements permanent” and claims “the Scottish Government is risking the health and wellbeing of vulnerable women and their unborn children and riding roughshod over democratic convention. It is dangerous for women, and it is dangerous for democracy.” ENDS Peter Kearney Director Catholic Media Office 0141 221 116807968 122291 pk@scmo.org www.scmo.org The full text of the article is shown below: Damaging Democracy Anthony Horan Director, Catholic Parliamentary Office Just last month the Scottish government broke with convention and deliberately set out to diminish the views of thousands of individuals who responded to a consultation on home abortions. The pandemic caused the government to change the rules for early abortions in 2020, allowing women to take abortion pills at home rather than under medical supervision.  Over the last 20 years hundreds of consultations have been conducted by the Scottish Government, generating thousands of responses and allowing evidence and opinion from organisations and individuals to feed in to public policy and legislation.  Only 17 per cent of submissions to the home abortion consultation supported home abortions being made permanent. A total of 61 per cent wanted them ended and 74 per cent believed they had a negative impact on the safety of women.  Additionally, more than 600 medical professionals signed an open letter to the Scottish, Welsh and English governments calling for an end to “at-home” abortion because of concerns about abortions occurring beyond the ten-week limit and about women and girls being coerced into an abortion against their will. DIY home abortions are also associated with incidents including significant pain and bleeding, ruptured ectopics and haemorrhage.  Yet, despite this, the Scottish Government shockingly sought to downplay those individuals who raised concerns, labelling a significant number of the responses as “organised by pro-life or faith groups...